National Coalition for Strengthening SC & ST PoA Act
National Dalit Movement for Justice (NDMJ)
SMS Help line to Address Violence Against Dalits and Adivasis in India
Type ATM < your message > Send to 9773904050
]
Fact Finding Report on rape of minor girl Sony Mallik(Name Changed) if village -Akarapada, PS/Dist.-Jajpur, Odisha (Code: OD-03.12.2022, Date: 22-Nov-2022 )
Back to searchCase Title
Case primary details
| Case posted by | Ambedkar Lohia Vichar Manch |
| Case code | OD-03.12.2022 |
| Case year | 22-Nov-2022 |
| Type of atrocity | Rape |
| Whether the case is being followed in the court or not? | Yes |
Fact Finding
Fact finding date
| Fact finding date | Not recorded |
Case Incident
Case Incident details
| Case incident date | 22-Nov-2022 |
| Place | Village: Not recorded Taluka:Not recorded District: JAJPUR State: Odisha |
| Police station | Not recorded |
| Complaint date | 21-Nov-2022 |
| FIR date | 21-Nov-2022 |
Case brief
Case summary
Akarapada is a revenue village under Jajpur police station. Some Scheduled caste people live in that village with other communities. Sony Mallik, daughter of Harihara Mallik is a 10 year old girl belonging to Scheduled Caste community. On 27.11.2022, Sony went to the betel shop near their house to fetch some commodities. It was around 12.30 during the day and the place was lonely at that time. The shopkeeper, Shambhunath Mahalik taking advantage of the deserted situation took Sony to the back of his shop and assaulted her with aggravated penetrative sexual assault. Due to delay in return of the child, her elder sister, Sumi (name changed) went to the shop to look for her; as she reached the shop, the accused left the little girl. Sumi asked what he was doing; Sambhunath slapped her. Both the sisters returned home and narrated all these incidents. The father and mother of the child went as soon as possible and reported the matter in Jajpur police station. The complaint was registered as Jajpur PS case no 432 dated 27.11.2022 under Sections 376(A), 376(B), 323 IPC, 3(2)(v) SC & ST PoA Act with 4(2), 6 POCSO Act. Some local residents said, with the condition of not revealing their names, that the incident is true because the shopkeeper is constantly engaged in such activities; he should be punished.