• Advance Search
  • From Date

    To Date

 Click here to sort older casesTotal records:1128

Mass attack on Dalits and their property destroyed over minor scuffle in Gohana

  • Posted by: NDMJ-Haryana
  • Date of incident: 27-08-2005
  • Create date: 28-11-2013
  • State:: Haryana
  • District:: SONIPAT
  • Police station:: Gohana
  • Summary:: On 27 August 2005 one Dalit named Shivpal, a resident of Balmiki Basti, went to a Photo Studio for a photograph to be clicked for him. At the Photo Studio itself there were some quarrel between Shivpal, another person named Baljit and some others. After this minor scuffle, Shivpal was joined some other Dalits from the Balmiki Basti and in the fights, which ensued Baljit who was Jat by caste died. The dominant Jat community of Gohana took it as insult on their caste pride and protested with the Police on 27 August itself. Immediately on the basis of their FIR in which 7 Dalits were named, the Police arrested four Dalits. The case was lodged under Section 148, 149, 302 and 323 of Indian Penal Code. Not happy with the arrest of four Dalits, the Jats convened a Maha Panchayat on 28 August and gave an ultimatum to the Police and Administration that if within 48 hours the culprits are not apprehended and justice done to the Jats, the Jats would burn the entire Balmiki Basti. Fearing retaliation from the dominant Jat community and also harassment by Police Dalits in the Balmiki Basti started fleeing from their houses in search of security to their kith and kin in the neighboring places like Sonepat, Panipat and others from 29 August 2005. On 31 August, another Maha Panchayat of Jats took place, a large group of 1500-2000 Jats fully armed with batons, axes, spears, petrol and kerosene oils entered the already deserted Balmiki Basti and started burning the houses. In the entire operation, which lasted about four hours, around 55 to 60 Dalit houses were burned by the rampaging mass of Jats. They also damaged TV, Refrigerators, and other useful items in the Dalit houses. It is also alleged that valuables have been looted from the Dalit houses. Even food grains were not spared. In the mayhem, which lasted for about four hours, the local Police ably assisted the rampaging mass of people. The Police claims to have fired 12 rounds in the air to disperse the mob. They did not take any credible action to stop the mass of 1500-2000 from burning and looting of Dalit houses. The Police filed an FIR under Section 148, 149, 109, 427, 435, 436, 307- 120B of IPC and Section 3(2) (IV) of SC and ST Act against 23 persons. The Police claims that Pradeep Sangwan, S/o, Kishan Sangwan, the Member of Parliament from Sonepat, and Ranveer Sangwan, brother of Kishan Sangwan have played a leading role in this whole incident.

Downloads

Rape of Dalit Woman with the Pretext of Wage

  • Posted by: NDMJ-Bihar
  • Date of incident: 18-08-2005
  • Create date: 22-03-2014
  • State:: Bihar
  • District:: MADHUBANI
  • Police station:: Pandaul
  • Chargesheet:: F.I.R registered, Chargesheet filed
  • Summary::

    Jungli Devi (Musahar, now deceased at 47 years) was married to Judan Sadai (55 years) at the age of 13 years.  She came to live with her husband in Haripur village, Pandaul block, Madhubani district, Bihar, and gave birth to five children: three daughters and two sons. The eldest two daughters, Buchia (25 years) and Sothai (22 years) are illiterate, married and live in other villages with their husbands and in-laws.  Jungli Devi’s sons Dinesh (12 years), Nunnu (10 years) and youngest daughter Gauri (7 years) are all unmarried; none of the children attend school.

     

    In February 2002 Jungli Devi\\\'s husband\\\'s hand became swollen and he developed a terrible itch.  Due to his scratching, a sore developed and grew worse, to the point that he could no longer perform agricultural work.  Jungli Devi took her husband to several local doctors and spent what little money they had attempting to treat the sore, but it did not improve.  People in Jungli Devi’s community began to say that Judan Sadai had contracted leprosy. Unable to work, Judan Sadai remained at home and took care of the children.  Jungli Devi took on her husband’s former role and began earning for the family as a daily wage agricultural labourer.  She took on all manner of agricultural work, even work ordinarily performed only by men, e.g. using a spade to break mud in the field.  As the economic burden of feeding her entire family rested upon her alone, she worked extremely hard and took whatever work was available.

     

    When no work was available in the village, Jungli Devi’s family went without food.  They ate only when she received wages for her labour. At one point in 2000 (Jungli Devi and her family cannot recall the season or exact date), Jungli Devi fell ill with an upset stomach. For three days at a stretch, she was unable to work in the fields and grew extremely weak.  As her children were starving, Jungli Devi approached a dominant caste man of her village, Mohan Yadav (BC Ahir, 50 years) and asked him to give her some grain so that her family might eat.  She promised to pay back the loan by working in his fields as soon as she recovered.  Mohan Yadav is a successful landowner in the village. He is married and has two grown sons. Mohan Yadav replied, “Whatever you need, be it grains or money, I am prepared to give.  But you must be prepared to do whatever work I ask you to do.”

     

    Jungli Devi agreed, not understanding what Mohan Yadav had in mind.  She said that she could do domestic work as well as agricultural work, and agreed to his condition that she work for him only, and no other landowner. Then Mohan Yadav gave Jungli Devi 10 kg of rice and Rs.100/-, and she returned to her house relieved.  In the coming days, she recovered from her illness and began working for Mohan Yadav. For the next nine months, Jungli Devi worked in Mohan Yadav\\\'s house and fields.  She was given fair wages and the Yadav family had no complaints.  Gradually, though, Mohan Yadav began to demand more work from Jungli while paying her less wages. One day Jungli said to Mohan Yadav, “I work all day long and you are paying me less wages. How will my family and I manage with such a tiny amount?” Mohan Yadav laughed and replied, “I will take care of all your needs, but you will also have to fulfil my needs.” Saying this, he advanced on Jungli Devi and made clear his intention to have sex with her. Though she protested, Mohan Yadav raped Jungli Devi.  Afterwards, he paid her an extra sum of money. Under pressure and economically dependent, Jungli Devi gradually came to accept the arrangement.  Form that time onward, Mohan Yadav maintained a sexually exploitative relationship with Jungli Devi. She continued to work in his house and fields, and he demanded and took sex from her whenever he wanted.

     

    In one instance, Jungli Devi was weeding Mohan Yadav’s sugarcane field.  Mohan came to the field, sat down and started talking to Jungli about her wages.  After a few words he said, “Actually, I didn’t come here to look at the field; I came here to have sex with you.”  Despite her discomfort, he put her on the ground in the field itself and had sex with her, stayed for a short while, and then returned to his house.  Jungli resumed her agricultural weeding. Another time, Jungli Devi was sitting in Mohan Yadav\\\'s cow shed, sorting and cleaning rice.  Mohan arrived, sat down and started talking to her, while Jungli simply kept working.  Then Mohan said, “I have a strong desire; I want to have sex with you now.  Besides, no one is around today, so we can do it here in the cow shed.”  He then satisfied himself with her in the cow shed and left. After some months, Jungli Devi suffered complications in her vagina.  Suffering from vaginal pain and swelling, she conveyed to Mohan Yadav that he should not have sex with her.  Mohan replied, “If you want wages, you must come to work.  And part of your work is fulfilling my desires.”

     

    Whenever Jungli Devi expressed her disinterest in having sex with him, Mohan Yadav became very angry and verbally abused her. Frequently he said, “You cunt! You have sex with your husband, but you won’t let me have it with you?” After this, he usually forced himself on her, and Jungli Devi, due to her total economic dependence, yielded. As Jungli Devi and her family were economically dependent on the perpetrator Mohan Yadav, she never attempted to lodge a case against him.

     

Downloads

Dalit community attacked for entering temple premises in Fazalpur village

  • Posted by: NDMJ-Haryana
  • Date of incident: 27-07-2005
  • Create date: 28-11-2013
  • State:: Haryana
  • District:: PALWAL
  • Police station:: Amarpur
  • Summary:: On 24 July 2005, Rajneesh, a Dalit youth, went up to the village temple premise to pick up a ‘Datun’ (Datun is used by the villagers to clean their teeth) from a tree. On seeing him, Lakhan Das, the head priest of that temple, stated abusing him on caste lines. Rajneesh also started arguing with the priest. In this quarrel, Rajneesh was allegedly hit on his head by a sharp weapon (Kulhadi) by the priest. Rajneesh returned to his house somehow. On seeing his condition, the enraged Dalits beat up the priest. Rajneesh was taken to the Civil Hospital on 24 July at Palwal. A complaint was lodged by Dalits which was not registered as an FIR by the local Police. Three tractors loaded with upper caste villagers beat up Lekhraj and Phool Singh at the Amarpur Chowki itself. They were again beaten at Fazalpur. The main culprits who beat up Lekh Raj and Phool Singh were as follows; Naresh, Rajvir, Ajit, Lal Singh, Vijan, Deepak, Sonu, and others. On the other hand the priest and other upper caste villagers lodged a complaint which was immediately registered as an FIR by the local Police on 25 July 2005 at Chandhat Police Station, District Faridabad. As per this FIR No. 98, seven Dalits of Badhram were named as the culprit for beating the priest, desecrating the temple premise and also for stealing Rs. 30,000 from the temple. They were charged under various sections of IPC like 148, 149, 323, 295, 379 and 356. Most of Dalit youth have fled from the village for fear of being beaten up or even being killed by the upper caste villagers. A reign of terror prevailed in the village. There is complete ostracisation of Dalit families in the village too. The upper caste villagers have also directed the village shopkeepers not to sell any commodity to the Dalit families. As a punishment the upper caste villagers also resorted to shaving of mustache of Dalits. An elderly Dalit, Bhajan Lal’s mustache was shaved of forcibly by the upper caste villagers on 10 August 2005. On 12 August 2005 the upper caste villagers set ablaze three to four houses belonging to Dalit families around 9 A.M. Lal Singh, Hanse and Bhim Singh were beaten up mercilessly by the upper caste people namely: Ajay, Ramvir and Lal Singh. Kamlesh, W/o, Hansraj, a Dalit woman was also allegedly assaulted with the intention of outraging her modesty by some upper caste men in the village. An FIR was finally lodged on 12 August 2005 at Chandhat Police Station under various sections of IPC and SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act. This FIR No.109 was lodged by Sukkan, S/o Natthi. The Dalits have named more than 12 people in the FIR, Ajay, Ramvir, Lal Singh, Vijan, Ajit, Bachchu, Mahavir, Jaipal, Surendra, Naresh, Deepak, Sonu and many others. The rivalry between Dalits and upper caste villagers is slightly longer than what one can get from the present incidents. As a matter of fact, the main point of contention between the Dalits and the upper caste villagers of Badhram village is about the assertiveness of Dalits to lead a life of dignity. The Dalits in this village have refused to do ‘Begar’ or forced labour for the upper caste villagers. The awareness among Dalits about their rights also led to hostility from the upper caste villagers on many occasion in the recent years. The construction of a statue of Dr. B.R.Ambedkar and a park on Panchayat land by Dalits became a bone of contention between the Dalits and upper caste villagers. On 3 December 2001, a board from the statue area was stolen which was found after 3 years and 3 months from the well of the Jagan Singh, the former Sarpanch of the village. On 2 April 2002 Dalits were prevented from using the main road in the village, following which an FIR was lodged by Dalits against seven upper caste villagers. On 19 April 2002 again a dispute over the construction of statue of Dr. B.R.Ambedkar led to filling of FIR against five upper caste villagers by the Dalits. Five upper caste villagers who were arrested by the Police on the basis of this FIR were, Baljit, S/o Shyam Lal, Naresh, S/o, Tejpal, Suresh, S/o, Tejpal, Vir Singh, S/o Surajmal, Suresh, S/o, Kishan. All the five accused were granted bail by the Civil Court later on. A statue of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar was inaugurated by the Shri. Babu Parmanand, the Governor of Haryana on 20 July 2003. Ever since then tension between Dalits and upper caste villagers has been simmering. On two occasions, the statue of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar was damaged by the upper caste villagers. About four to five cases are pending in the Lower Court over the legality of the land and the construction of the statue on it.

Downloads

Dalit community attacked for entering temple in Chandhat village

  • Posted by: NDMJ-Haryana
  • Date of incident: 24-07-2005
  • Create date: 28-11-2013
  • State:: Haryana
  • District:: FARIDABAD
  • Police station:: Chandhat
  • Summary:: The practice of untouchability is rampant in Chandhat village under Chandhat in Faridabad Dist. Thus the Dalit community was attacked with lathi, lethal, pistol, gun etc. by Non- Dalits for entering temple to offer puja. On the same day the complaint was given by Dalits in Chandhat police station, but FIR was not registered against the perpetrators. On 12th August, 2005, the Non-Dalits set ablaze three to four Dalit houses and Lal Singh, Hanse and Bhimsingh were beaten up. Kamlesh w/o Hansraj was also assaulted by Non Dalits. A case was registered against the assailants in Chandhat police station on 12/08/2005, No. 109/05, u/s 148, 149, 323, 354, 356, 435, 436, 506, 341 IPC & 3.33.89 of SC/ST (PoA) Act, but none of the accused persons was arrested. The sections of SC/ST (PoA) were removed by investingating officer while framing charge sheet. There is a complete ostranisation of Dalit families in the village. They have directed the village shopkeepers not to sell any commodity to Dalits. As a punishment the upper caste resorted to shaving the mustache of Dalits. An elderly Dalit Bhajan Lal’s mustache was shaved off forcibly on 10th August.

Downloads

Encroachment on Dalit land

  • Posted by: Social Awareness Society for Youths-SASY
  • Date of incident: 12-07-2005
  • Create date: 26-11-2013
  • State:: Tamil Nadu
  • District:: KANCHEEPURAM
  • Chargesheet:: not filed
  • Summary:: Forty families of Irulas were living in Edayankuppam village of Thandalam Panchayat, Kancheepuram District for several generations. They had built their house in road poromboke (Survey No.2/1). They applied for getting ownership rights for their houses. Since they were living in road poromboke they were denied ownership rights. After long and prolonged struggle they were issued patta in Natham poromboke land which is allotted for housing in the year 2008. After that only Officials came to know that the same place is road Puramboke. Due to this problem. Till now the Revenue Officials have not taken efforts to survey the land alloted to individuals. At present Arison company has unauthorisedly occupied that land built wall and fenced it. The village panchayat has also passed resolution to remove the encroachment and met the District Collector several times. But even the district and Taluk Revenue Officers have not taken any action. The Irula women have submitted complaint to District Collector on 12.07.2005 and another complaint on 05.05.2008

Downloads

Total Visitors : 13797723
© All rights Reserved - Atrocity Tracking and Monitoring System (ATM)
Website is Managed & Supported by Swadhikar